3 : Gr, Ir, In + Toch


I
ā(i)ĝh- : īĝh-
Bedeutung
bedürfen, begehren

Ir
Av. āzi-š m. `Begierde', np. az ds., av. āza-š m. `Streben, Eifer'; ablautend av. izyati `strebt, verlangt nach' und ī̆žā `Streben, Eifer, Erfolg'

In
ai. īhā `Verlangen', īhatē `strebt wonach';

Gr.
ἀ̄χήν `dürftig' = ἠχῆνες · κενοί, πτωχοί Hes. (durch Anlehnung an Worte, mit ἀ-privativum daraus ἀεχῆνες · πένητες Hes., und ἀχενία `Mangel, Armut'), κτεανηχής · πένης Hes., ablautend ἰχανάω `begehre', ιχαρ `Begierde';

Toch
toch. A ākāl, В akālk `Wunsch, Sehnsucht'.

Commentaires

Enregistrer un commentaire

Posts les plus consultés de ce blog

8 main groups

It Gm He Arm Ba Sl Ir Ind PC Gm He Arm Ba Sl Ir Ind PC It He Arm Ba Sl Ir Ind PC It Gm Arm Ba Sl Ir Ind PC It Gm He Ba Sl Ir Ind PC It Gm He Arm Sl Ir Ind PC It Gm He Arm Ba Ir Ind PC It Gm He Arm Ba Sl Ind PC It Gm He Arm Ba Sl Ir QC Gm He Arm Ba Sl Ir Ind QC It He Arm Ba Sl Ir Ind QC It Gm Arm Ba Sl Ir Ind QC It Gm He Ba Sl Ir Ind QC It Gm He Arm Sl Ir Ind QC It Gm He Arm Ba Ir Ind QC It Gm He Arm Ba Sl Ind QC It Gm He Arm Ba Sl Ir QC PC He Arm Ba Sl Ir Ind QC PC Gm Arm Ba Sl Ir Ind QC PC Gm He Ba Sl Ir Ind QC PC Gm He Arm Sl Ir Ind QC PC Gm He Arm Ba Ir Ind QC PC Gm He Arm Ba Sl Ind QC PC Gm He Arm Ba Sl Ir QC PC It Arm Ba Sl Ir Ind QC PC It He Ba Sl Ir Ind QC PC It He Arm Sl Ir Ind QC PC It He Arm Ba Ir Ind QC PC It He Arm Ba Sl Ind QC PC It He Arm Ba Sl Ir QC PC It Gm Ba Sl Ir Ind QC PC It Gm Arm Sl Ir Ind QC PC It Gm Arm Ba Ir Ind QC PC It Gm Arm Ba Sl Ind QC PC It Gm Arm Ba Sl Ir I QC PC It Gm He Sl Ir Ind QC PC It Gm He Ba Ir Ind QC PC It Gm He Ba Sl Ind QC PC It Gm He Ba...
Lire la suite

My Intention with This Blog

My Intention with This Blog · Intentions and Theorems, Continued · Which Groups are not Main Ones and Why? I intend, in the first place, to go through Pokorny, "word" after "word" (or word-root after word-root). Each one is classified into an appropriate slot on whether it has for instance 5 main groups, like : Q-Celtic, P-Celtic, Germanic, Slavic, Indic, or rather 3 of them, like: Germanic, Greek, Indic. All words fitting the one description will go to the one post, all fitting another one will go to another post, and all of these posts will be linked to from lists of 3 group combinations, 5 group combinations and so on. If the PIE thesis is true, it does not necessarily mean that words with all ten groups will be more frequent than words with just three groups, it could be a long time since the PIE era deleted most words from more than 7 groups, but the 3 group words would be fairly equally distributed along the 120 possible combinations of 3 groups and the...
Lire la suite

Intentions and Theorems, Continued

My Intention with This Blog · Intentions and Theorems, Continued · Which Groups are not Main Ones and Why? Suppose we find lots of "adjacent" groups (like Celtic Germanic, Celtic Italic, Germanic Italic, Germanic (Illyric) Greek, Italic (Illyric) Greek) preserving a word not preserved at "opposite end" of the geographical spread of Indo-European language group. Couldn't this be just the chance that adjacency tends to help adjacent groups to help each other to keep a word? Well, adjacency would help them to keep the word, but lack of it would not doom the word at the opposite end of the geographical spread. So, the Sprachbund theorem (by Trubetskoy, for those who do not know the founder of Balkan linguistics) would get a boost if "adjacent" plus "previously adjacent" groups were very prevalent in the preservation of words. And the proto-language or PIE theorem (by lots, from Bopp and Grimm to Pokorny, whose lexicon I am using) would e...
Lire la suite